<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Noelle Talley - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/noelle_talley</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Noelle Talley&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19955</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Attorney General can serve as a Special Prosecutor when requested by a local district attorney.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well Colon Willoughby has hired L&#039;il Mikey Easley for the summer so don&#039;t expect his office the do anything useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:47:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Taxpayer2008</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19955 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19860</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With Mike Sleazely having been the former NC Atty General, why should we now think we have a strong one?   They are of the same mold, are they not?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:23:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19860 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19849</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;He said many people have been talking about him about the (Senate) race. He said he has heard from the Democratic Senate leadership, which is trying to recruit him.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/coop_will_decide_by_spring&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s why he&#039;s in a quandry.  How can he stay loyal to Basnight &amp;amp; Co. and serve the NC voters at the same time?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He can&#039;t.  He won&#039;t cut off his nose to spite his face.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forget about the Senate in 2010 &#039;Coop&#039;.  Its obvious your loyalties are not with the voters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:40:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Taxpayer2008</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19849 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19847</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why is the N&amp;amp;O not pursuing Cooper? The N&amp;amp;O is well-known for breaking these kinds of stories.  Cooper may be the key to corruption in Raleigh.  He is the sole arbiter of who gets investigated and he is protecting his benefactors.  He tried to protect Nifong until the media did its job!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:26:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ruralnc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19847 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19840</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Cooper, your job is to root out corruption in this state.  Currently, the Democrats nearly have a monopoly on corruption.  Do your job, Mr. Cooper, and prosecute those who are acting unlawfully.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:23:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JRS1988</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19840 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19836</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sure he has investigated Democrats but only when the feds started the investigation.  He has never started an investigation in NC on his own.  He should do is job instead of running for the U.S. Senate.  Also, why is he drawing out the case against him?  Is he hoping that it won&#039;t come to trial until after the election?  I think he should go to trial and get it out of the way before running for election.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:07:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lpetrou</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19836 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cooper Lies &quot; We&#039;ve investigated Democrats&quot;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19832</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In every case cited his office was dragged kicking and screaming into the investigation.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His office has never taken the lead or actively worked to root out the massive amount of corruption by Democrats in North Carolina over the past few years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now he&#039;s trying to run for US Senate and rewrite history casting himself as a corruption fighter.  Please.  Hopefully the media won&#039;t let this new narrative take hold.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:33:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19832 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We&#039;ve investigated Democrats</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_weve_prosecuted_democrats#comment-19828</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Minor wording change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:32:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19828 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We investigate corruption too</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_we_investigate_corruption_too#comment-14018</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You don&#039;t pay much attention, do you?  Cooper &amp;amp; Easley have never been close, and the governor doesn&#039;t appoint the AG (at least I think that&#039;s what your post suggests you believe, as amazing as that level of civic and political ignorance would be in someone so vocal about politics.) If you don&#039;t mean to suggest that she will appoint one of those two as AG, why are they relevant to this discussion?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:50:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bellaparola</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14018 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We investigate corruption too</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_we_investigate_corruption_too#comment-13984</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He&#039;s positioning for a run at Senator Burr.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:37:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>razor0397</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13984 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We investigate corruption too</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_we_investigate_corruption_too#comment-13979</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cooper is a Sleazely hack...he is also Status Quo...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will Bev choose Willoughby or Rand?  Does she have the nerve to select Rand?  NC will be watching her EVERY move closely, in fear of what she will do to us next.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:40:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13979 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cooper: We investigate corruption too</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_we_investigate_corruption_too#comment-13977</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How many investigations has the AG&#039;s office instigated?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How many prosecutions have they SOLELY brought about?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer to both questions is more than likely zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All they do is jump on the bandwagon once someone else (USDA, Wake Co. DA) has done the heavy lifting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:25:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cthayes75</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13977 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Moore hires his own lawyer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_hires_his_own_lawyer#comment-5385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BLUENC isn&#039;t just one person.   There&#039;s  wide range of opinions there. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:09:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5385 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Moore hires his own lawyer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_hires_his_own_lawyer#comment-5383</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And when they hire Republican lawyers, what will BlueNC make of that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Prospero</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5383 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ryan, Ryan, Oh Ryan</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_hires_his_own_lawyer#comment-5377</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t there any way that you can display the name of the &quot;person&quot; commenting along with the title of the comment in that sidebar?    It&#039;s discouraging to click onto a comment and see that it&#039;s just someone sputtering, ya know?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t it be doable, just to save some people the discouragement?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m getting to the point of not wanting to click onto a comment because chances are so good that it&#039;s just FCC hissing and spitting. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:50:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5377 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
