<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Harvey Gantt - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/harvey_gantt</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Harvey Gantt&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: More tea leaves on the Senate race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_tea_leaves_on_the_senate_race#comment-20377</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Your article here seems a little politically incorrect on a couple of accounts. Can you please explain each category a little more?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:24:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20377 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15800</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is very exciting to see a fresh new face lead this poll! Cal has so much to bring to the political scene. His knowledge and life experiences far exceed his age in years. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:52:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stella123</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15800 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15798</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Easley has not been outgoing enough as governor, and I don&#039;t think he has the ability to relate to people that a US senator should have.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:37:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cchoover</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15798 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15797</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cal would be great, I would support him 150%&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:35:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cchoover</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15797 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15795</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about Cal Cunningham from Lexington?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CarolinaJeanie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15795 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15794</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cal Cunningham &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:32:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rcoxman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15794 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15749</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about Easley since he&#039;s a recognizable figure and more likely than the aforementioned contenders?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:23:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CarltonHuffman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15749 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pollster wants to hear from you</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pollster_wants_to_hear_from_you#comment-15750</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about Easley since he&#039;s a recognizable figure and more likely than the aforementioned contenders?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:23:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CarltonHuffman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15750 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The case for McCain in N.C.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_case_for_mccain_in_n_c#comment-12945</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough. I changed the wording. The point was that it&amp;#39;s easy to overstate the influence of relocated Yankees (which includes myself!). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:40:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12945 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The case for McCain in N.C.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_case_for_mccain_in_n_c#comment-12944</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Do you really believe this statement &#039;the vast majority of the state&#039;s voters are still native conservatives&#039; could be even hypothetically true?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PPP did a study over the summer about changing demographics in the electorate.  We found about 55% of people voting in the state are natives.  Let&#039;s go on the very high end and say two/thirds of those people are conservatives.  That would put the electorate at about 37% native conservatives (I&#039;d say 25-30% is a more realistic figure.)  That is not a &#039;vast majority.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:36:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TomJensen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12944 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Junior Johnson</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_case_for_mccain_in_n_c#comment-12943</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bluenc.com/most-important-race-all&quot;&gt;blogging at BlueNC&lt;/a&gt; for Barack Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:19:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12943 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Castellanos: Godless ad over the line</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/castellanos_godless_ad_over_the_line#comment-12598</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No, this ad is not over the line. It informs the public on who Hagan associates with and recieves money from. Hagan has always supported higher taxes, just look at her record in the NC legislature. Hagan also benefits from high energy costs due to her many investments in oil and gas companies. Hagan is a part of the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:20:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bacchianm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12598 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Obama, Perdue on mailer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/obama_perdue_on_mailer#comment-12432</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While McCrory would be fighting for Duke Energy and big banks. You know the &quot;power elite&quot;, the &quot;culture of arrogance&quot;, the &quot;I&#039;m Pat McCrory the difference is leadership&quot;. It is truly refreshing to see someone be so honest and admit corruption and power elite about himself, and he even touts Perdue&#039;s leadership. He further admitted on his infamous FoxLive interview on October 13th (you remember, &quot;Sarah Palin is hotter in person&quot;) that he wouldn&#039;t even vote for himself. I agree!  What a guy!! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:04:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pickingperdue</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12432 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Obama, Perdue on mailer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/obama_perdue_on_mailer#comment-12354</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah these two are going to fight for us alright.  Obama is going to be fighting to raise our taxes to pay for massive government spending, while Ole&#039;Bev will be fighting to keep the corrupt status quo in Raleigh.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:14:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>breining24</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12354 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Obama, Perdue on mailer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/obama_perdue_on_mailer#comment-12349</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh dear, you have this one all wrong!  McCrory said this long before Baldwin did, and worse yet, Baldwin did it as a parody on slimy, gross old men.  If you watched SNL, you saw Palin roll her eyes in disgust.  If you heard McCrory on FoxLive, you would know Playboy Pat said it first, was serious, and could only then be a caricature of himself and all slimy, gross men!  Maybe Baldwin heard Pat say it and thought it was ridiculous enough to use as fodder on SNL!!  This is a REAL issue - McCrory is irreverent and irresponsible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:52:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pickingperdue</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12349 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
