<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Washington Post - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/washington_post</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Washington Post&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Post: Kissell vote &#039;inexplicable&#039; </title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/post_kissell_vote_inexplicable#comment-27478</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Amazing that he exhibited such backbone like the football player Shuler D-NC11th district!  We are proud of Heath for HIS NO vote and look forward to everyone paying for THEIR OWN healthcare insurance across state lines!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taxpayers can NO LONGER pay for others&#039; healthcare...period.  Its not a function of our government.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:07:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27478 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Post: Kissell vote &#039;inexplicable&#039; </title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/post_kissell_vote_inexplicable#comment-27476</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;As for Kissell, his &#039;no&#039; vote is close to inexplicable given the heavy black population in his district (28 percent)&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, if we&#039;re going to make generalizations about Jesse Helms&#039; &quot;bloc vote&quot; (which is pathetic in itself; apparently even the WaPo believes &quot;black voters&quot; to be unquestioning pawns of the Democratic Machine), then we have to say that Kissell knows those same voters who voted +5 for BHO will most likely not vote in his re-election campaign.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its a statistical fact that until last year, voter turnout among the voting bloc was lower than optimal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He&#039;s just playing good politics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:40:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cdtew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27476 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Post: Kissell vote &#039;inexplicable&#039; </title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/post_kissell_vote_inexplicable#comment-27475</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;.... &quot;He&#039;s a disgrace to all North Carolinians.&quot;....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speak for your(arrogant)self PoliticalJunkie. You surely do NOT speak for me. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:36:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AgentPierce</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27475 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Just the Democratic Party?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/post_kissell_vote_inexplicable#comment-27474</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He&#039;s a disgrace to all North Carolinians.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:02:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27474 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Post: Kissell vote &#039;inexplicable&#039; </title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/post_kissell_vote_inexplicable#comment-27470</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This man is a disgrace to the Democrat party. I truly hope he receives a Primary from a Black candidate&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:13:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Montcalm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27470 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-26479</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious, what is your opinion of Edwards indictment chances?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:43:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sarahsinger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26479 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21278</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Agent Pierce, yer killin me again!  ROFL!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WHERE are the baby pictures?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:19:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21278 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of the best comments from the Washington Post article today because it is a succinct observation about Edwards.  &quot;John Edwards is an ugly, lying, perverse, evil, corrupt, manipulative slime ball. A used condom has more value than John Edwards. What he did to his wife should shut him up and drive him to a cave where he could hide in shame for the rest of his unnatural life. There is only one other descriptive term that fits John Edwards: Democrat!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:17:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IKWUM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21275 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21274</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another N&amp;amp;O Puff Piece for this loser.  Edwards needs to go a lot further than Haiti to find someone who gives a darn about him.  Well except for his buddies at the N &amp;amp; O.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:41:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mark4java</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21274 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>His reputation stinks</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21272</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;His reputation stinks worse than franklin st after holloween. He should just stay in chapel Hill and maybe the brain-dead PCer&#039;s there will enbrace him. They seem to embrace everything and anything that the rest of the world wants nothing to do with. He should feel right at home there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:13:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>fredflintstone</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21272 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21270</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
PLEASE PLEASE GO AWAY !!!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:11:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jejohn8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21270 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21269</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder why &quot;Silky Pony&quot; has to travel to Latin America to help with poverty.  Seems to be plenty of poverty right here in RTP, especially Durham.  Perhaps he can organize the first &quot;Obamaville&quot; for unemployed homeless folks outside of Chapel Hill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:10:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wuptdo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21269 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21266</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What reputation?  Who cares.  John who??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:55:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Notsurewhere_NC</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21266 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21265</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We need a ruling here.  Does a &quot;John&quot; article still count towards the N&amp;amp;O rule of an Edwards article at least once/week come hel* or high water.  I say it counts.  Courageous Elizabeth articles are certainly &quot;better&quot; if they redredge up ALL the various Edwards Perils. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:49:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AgentPierce</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21265 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Reputation not his focus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_reputation_not_his_focus#comment-21264</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of north carolina&#039;s finest rich,corrupt,dishonest politcians. Maybe the democrats can convince him to run for governor in 2012.LOL The sad part is they would elect him!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:57:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 21264 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
