<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Internal Revenue Service - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/internal_revenue_service</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Internal Revenue Service&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NAACP avoiding taxes?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/excess_lobbying_taxed_heavily#comment-19057</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is that why Rev. Barber refuses to register as a lobbyist despite the fact he is constantly at the legislature lobbying?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:01:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19057 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17759</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey scharrison looks like ANOTHER DEMOCRATIC cabinet nominee by Democratic President Barack Obama has problems not paying taxes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DEMOCRATIC Govenor of Kansas Sebilius and her husband owed over $8,000 in taxes and fines. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What were you saying about Republicans again? Grandstanding is not a crime. Not paying your taxes is a crime.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:38:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17759 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17735</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I stand (sit) corrected. There are a lot more names from Durham than Charlotte, it just seemed like there were mostly big numbers from the QC. There&#039;s some big numbers from Durham too...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17735 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17734</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;note to the note to the note to the note:  Check out Durham.  There may be more back taxes in the Durham, than everyone&#039;s favorite city to hate Charlotte. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:23:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GrayJ</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17734 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17717</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In case anybody&#039;s interested, here&#039;s the N.C. Department of Revenue&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dornc.com/collect/QryMostWanted.pdf&quot;&gt;Most Wanted list&lt;/a&gt; of those who owe back taxes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;note: it&#039;s a really fat pdf file (47 pages).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;note to the note: that&#039;s not a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;note to the note to the note: check out the Charlotte section. Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:53:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17717 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Very good bill and a very good example of why you will make a terrific Congressman.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:56:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>whbjwhbj</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17709 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17704</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;scharrison   You do make a reasonable point in paragraph 2 but when you have the person being appointed to be in charge of the $$ and he fails to file his own taxes you just have to wonder...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, I am registered democrat and I think both parties are full of losers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:37:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17704 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17702</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is exactly the kind of pointless partisan grandstanding that has earned the North Carolina Republican Party its powerless minority position.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ooh! How about this: we should stop arresting drunk drivers and writing tickets to speeders because all those Senators and Representatives up in D.C. get special treatment by the police! It ain&#039;t fair!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Ground Control to Major Jerry: adjust your oxygen feed. That last transmission indicates a likely hypoxia situation.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:23:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17702 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17700</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant, absolutely brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:13:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17700 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17696</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent Idea!  and then abolish all NC income taxes and evil food taxes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:58:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17696 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill name-checks Treasury secretary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_name_checks_treasury_secretary#comment-17694</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well done sir well done...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:51:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenOpinionated</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17694 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would withhold taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_withhold_taxes#comment-17611</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No, that&amp;#39;s freedom of the press. Free speech is a separate clause in the First Amendment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:11:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17611 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would withhold taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_withhold_taxes#comment-17610</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does freedom of speech only refer to the media that writes infammatory, biased &#039;news&#039; stories?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:14:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17610 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would withhold taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_withhold_taxes#comment-17603</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Senator Hoyle should have been in the Obama&#039;s administration vetting team?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are now in the top five of states for the highest unemployment. Maybe it is time for the Democrats to cut programs that are not needed or essential. And give businesses and individuals that actually pay taxes in NC a break. If we have more liquid income we will trickle that back up, LOL.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:29:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17603 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would withhold taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_withhold_taxes#comment-17595</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It would be a great opportunity for Sen. Hoyle to promote the idea of&lt;br /&gt;
the FAIRTAX proposal in Congress as a way for NC to become more equitable in tax collections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.Fairtax.org&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Find the Fairtax group in your neighborhood and JOIN!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:57:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17595 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
