newsobserver.com projects - G.K. Butterfield - Comments

Re: Butterfield has $231,000

rowdyone — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:02:27 -0500

To Gigglebox:

haven't had the privilege of reading info about Larkins, but your sarcasm is ill placed.

Re: Butterfield has $231,000

GiggleBox — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:17:59 -0500

Chad Larkins has not reported raising any money in the race.

That's surprising given his background of mowing lawns.

Is this a joke?

Re: Woolard makes "durrrr" face for N&O, Paul Terrel defends

GiggleBox — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:06:28 -0400

I understand your obsession with Sarah Palin now. Why can't dumb people run stuff for a change? It worked for 8 years under GWB!

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

GiggleBox — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:51:11 -0400

We need more people in Congress not paid off by trial lawyers and unions.

Right. Because there aren't enough cross-eyed rich white sons of people that call their brood "Junior" or Paul the Tird. I meant third.

Send him money Paul if you think he has a chance. He actually does more than you to ever be anything more than a Dome poster that somehow managed to not alienate less than one in five voters. HA!

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

PaulTerrell — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:59:43 -0400

Why are Conmax and gigglebox both left wing radical democrats against a small business owner running for Congress?

We need more people in Congress not paid off by trial lawyers and unions. We need someone who depends only on himself for personal income who will not be bought off like the Democratic Congressman from New Orleans paid off with cash. ( Caught with 90k in freezer). Or someone like Rangel-D who is caught not paying his taxes and then lies about it.

This Republican Gentleman will be honest and transparent.

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

TruthSquad — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:27:43 -0400

Where is the moderator of this blog? Asleep as usual! Come on people, let's try to have an intelligent conversation.

Congratulations to Mr. Woolard. No member of Congress should go unopposed - and who knows, he may actually have a chance, considering Mr. Butterfield's record.

Put some meat on those bones, boys - and by the way, get rid of the tattoos, moderator.

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

yangyang — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:50:07 -0400

tattoo clothing , Ed Hardy Tattoos,ed tattoos,ed clothing, ed hoody, ed apparel, ed ladies, ed swimwear/bikini, ed purses/wallets, ed shoes/sneakers, ed hardy clothing UK, ed hardy tattoo clothes

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

GiggleBox — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:04:23 -0400

Why are democrackkks SO damn INTOLERANT of others?

Heightened sense of smell perhaps? For example, your post smells like irony. "99-44/100% Pure®: It Floats."

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

BitterEXdemocrat — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:09:40 -0400

Why are democrackkks SO damn INTOLERANT of others?

Butterfield needs his A** kicked out of the District of Criminals!

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

ConMax — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:39:43 -0400

So we have a rich white young frat corporate Republican Insurance boy running in a total Democrat Congressional district?....So his message is get off your lazy rear while on Obama stimilus welfare and get a job at Bojangles!

Re: Woolard to challenge Butterfield

GiggleBox — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:11:46 -0400

Where do I give?

Oh, I pay insurance premiums so I already have...

Hey Dome, has ECU ever not 'gradu-approved' a cross-eyed future insurance salesman with rich parents?

Re: Congressmen seek money for pork

mschucker — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:41:21 -0400

I would rather see the money go to clean up the end product of all that pork, the euphemistically named "hog lagoon". While the stench makes it obvious that it is polluting the air, it is also an environmental disaster for our precious rivers, streams and groundwater.

Re: Congressmen seek money for pork

mschucker — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:37:08 -0400

I would rather see the money go toward cleaning up the euphemistically named
"hog lagoons". They stink to the high heavens and they pose an environmental disaster to our ground water.

Re: Congressmen seek money for pork

stanley2 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:32:27 -0400

Indeed I think the classic concept of "the rich get richer, the poor get poorer" here.

I personally do not see why the taxpayer should have to foot the bill for this either, and whether or not this helps prevent the reoccuranced of the swine flu epidemic remains to be seen.

golf exercises

golf stretches

Re: Congressmen seek money for pork

TOPASSISTANT — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:43:59 -0400

AMERICA IS BEYOND BROKE. Join the Fire Etheridge Campaign. Send me an e-mail to help, Smokey1977@att.net