<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - unions - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/unions</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;unions&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Unions put millions into health debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/unions_put_millions_into_health_care_debate#comment-25001</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;But key voting blocs, including state workers and many service workers, are represented by labor groups such as the Service Employees International Union, or SEIU. Labor groups have organized rallies, town hall meetings, phone banks and advertising in support of health-care reform.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you sure about this?  I thought it was the insurance companies who were busing these mobs in from out-of-town.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:44:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>domewatcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25001 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Unions put millions into health debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/unions_put_millions_into_health_care_debate#comment-24999</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Miller-Democrat is for sale. Looks like the Unions are &quot;manufacturing&quot; support to destroy the best healthcare this world has. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want a representative for the 13th district that is not a screw up like Miller is. When it comes to the MASSIVE debt that Miller has voted for then BILL RANDALL-Republican is your candidate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:50:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24999 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Board of Community Colleges</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/unions_put_millions_into_health_care_debate#comment-24960</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s see...........you can be an illegal (oh, excuse me, UNDOCUMENTED) immigrant, supposedly wanted by ICE, BUT welcomed with open arms and pay out of state tuition.  WONDERFUL!!  Only in America.  I suppose that soon, the Board idiots will come up with some stupid plan to allow all the terrorists at GITMO to somehow become eligible for free college paid by the taxpayers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:02:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>exuma59</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24960 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. trusts military, not Wall Street</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_trusts_military_not_wall_street#comment-18866</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Polls like these are rather silly. People should be judged on their own records, not as a group. That having been said, notice how nonsensical these group judgments are. For example, how can we trust the military if we cannot trust the politicians who have the constitutional responsibility to regulate the military? After all, civilian politicians control the military (and that is the way it should be).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:35:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JustWondering</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18866 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. trusts military, not Wall Street</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_trusts_military_not_wall_street#comment-18811</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another &quot;famous&quot; Elon Poll without the demographic data to back its findings. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:05:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>omegaman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18811 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Perdue dedicates union hall</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/perdue_dedicates_union_hall#comment-18587</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&quot;Perdue was elected last year with significant support from organized labor.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is an understatement!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmccampaigns.com/page/case-study-how-the-west-was-won&quot;&gt;How the West was Won&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let it be very clear, which I think it is, Labor is trying so hard to change this state for their advantage and sock puppets like Perdue and Hagan will help them. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenOpinionated</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18587 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18284</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That movie deliverance, with Ned Beatty kept folks away from our mountains  back in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s. Then you left wing liberal freaks decided that you love to have a little chase and play piggy in a mountain laurel thicket.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:01:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18284 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes, MountainMan?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18229</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;gosh you can dish it out, but you can&#039;t take it!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m fully aware that in your one particular area of expertise I&#039;m Ned Beatty. Problem for you is, in this one, you&#039;re mine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now squeal like a pig for me until you have a budget with numbers, and a plan to do something but send jobs overseas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Squeeeeeeal Republican. Squeal like a pig. Come on!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:05:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18229 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18226</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;gosh you can dish it out, but you can&#039;t take it!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:04:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18226 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18225</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s amazing to me that Hagen even won with Internet posters like &quot;MountainMan&quot; and &quot;BitterEXDemocrat&quot; posting such logical points as this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hagen you make sick!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean what &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; this nation come to when fringe elements with Internet access don&#039;t supersede Democratic elections?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:36:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18225 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18222</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hagen you make sick!!!!!!!you are a communist or something worse. The secret ballot insures individuals right to vote as they see fit without being intimidated by a bunch of pro-union thugs!!!! But of course you know that already without me pointing out. I know your game, the unions control workers and their vote, now I am getting at the truth. The democrat communist congress controls the unions, Lord Obama controls congress!!! So you can basicly elect yourself. Keep printing money and soon we will be speaking chineese. The only good thing about that is the people will be rid of you and that bunch of parasites in washington.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:10:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18222 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18208</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hagan is UNFIT FOR SERVICE ! ! !&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:16:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18208 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Saying no to EFCA? Thanks for undermining Democracy!</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/card_check_battle_warms_up#comment-18200</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I am not going to take your response too seriously. From my experience, people that attack the messenger and not the message are usually diverting attention from the fact that they do not have a worthwhile argument from the outset. You do this in two places: 1) You assume that because I posted the comment last week that I actually spent a month laboring over a response. Get real! Did you even read what I wrote, because you really say nothing about it? 2) You attack the CEPR based on your perception of the institute’s political leaning rather than critics based on the data’s empirical or methodological merits. Furthermore, just because you use the term “liberal” means nothing, since so many see anything to the left of Fox News as a bastion of leftwing liberalism. The term, as you use it, is devoid of anything concrete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short, if you’re going to actually respond, maybe you need to be the one to take a few weeks and formulate concrete arguments.  The only thing of substance you post is a quote from the Heritage Foundation (and you never quote anything anyway) and the questions about GM and BMW plants, What’s your point with these question? Maybe you should be the one to sort out the argument, rather than relying on me. As far as the legal recourse under the current system, have you ever gone through that process? The fact that you defend it as a viable remedy against management intimidation tells me you never did. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:13:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>RichardWhitehead</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18200 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Not enough votes for card check</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_not_enough_votes_for_card_check#comment-18174</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So private voting isn&#039;t an American heritage anymore?  Even the new government in Iraq allows their citizens to cast votes in private.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After we&#039;ve seen how well the Unions have helped the auto industry, why do we want more of that kind of influence?  Oh yeah, votes for Dems.  My bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:27:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rusty_shackleford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18174 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Saying no to EFCA? Thanks for undermining Democracy!</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/card_check_battle_warms_up#comment-18093</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;First of all, I am glad that it took you approximately a month to formulate your thoughts on the matter, but hell I will bite and play with you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If someone is illegally fired, do they have the option of going through the court system? The CEPR is nothing short of a liberal think tank, so I can automatically respond with a quote from the Heritage Foundation, which touts how high union intimidation has gotten in recent years.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How much do union workers make in Detroit at the GM plant?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How much do comparable workers make in South Carolina at the BMW plant? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:27:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenOpinionated</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18093 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
