<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Iowa - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/iowa</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Iowa&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: No endorsement yet from Edwards</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/no_endorsement_yet_from_edwards#comment-3682</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;is it possible he&#039;s holding out for VP?&lt;br /&gt;
I doubt it, but might explain his hesitance to endorse. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:52:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>really</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3682 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Reeves: Edwards&#039; response to Iowa off</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/father_of_the_bride/reeves_edwards_response_to_iowa_off#comment-3078</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With regard to to the first part of Edwards&#039; claim, I think, based on the debate in New Hampshire, you can safely say the message is Edwards and Obama represent change (thus the 1,2 finish) and Clinton represents the status quo. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second part...eh, I dunno...I think he forgot that in that 1,2 finish, he was actually #2. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:49:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>natdug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3078 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Mass exodus in Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/mass_exodus_in_iowa#comment-2971</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As much as Rob has done for Edwards over the years you&#039;d think he&#039;d be able to get a flight on campaign plane.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What an ingrate...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:17:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Senate</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2971 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Iowa results in new cash flow</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_iowa_results_in_new_cash_flow#comment-2969</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really shocked that everyone&#039;s acting like he did badly in Iowa. He beat Hillary. I know some predicted he would do that &amp;amp; even better, but it was never a done deal. He could have come in third and it wouldn&#039;t have been a huge surprise. Slow &amp;amp; steady... &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:00:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mary27606</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2969 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Iowa results in new cash flow</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_iowa_results_in_new_cash_flow#comment-2965</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Love John Edwards... Hate Joe Trippi. Just putting it out there...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:58:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2965 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Iowa results in new cash flow</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_iowa_results_in_new_cash_flow#comment-2964</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a North Carolina political blog. He&amp;#39;s a North Carolina politician. There really isn&amp;#39;t much more to it than that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:58:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2964 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards: Iowa results in new cash flow</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_iowa_results_in_new_cash_flow#comment-2963</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why does the N&amp;amp;O always lavish such attention on Edwards - he doesn&#039;t even poll first in his own, adopted state...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:48:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chipzug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2963 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The final (meta-)Four</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_final_meta_four#comment-2962</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice &quot;pun&quot;ditry with the blogpost title, Ryan!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:32:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wayne_Goodwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2962 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The winner of the Dome pool</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_winner_of_the_dome_pool#comment-2959</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Now, if I could just do as well when it comes to picking ESPN&#039;s NCAA Tournament brackets...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:39:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>flwilliams1970</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2959 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2954</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;THE CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:33:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2954 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2952</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Good weather&quot; on caucus night (nothing falling and temps all the way up in the mid-20s) encourages the first-timers to come out for Obama.  The Clinton organization comes through to retain a solid second place.  Fightin&#039; John Edwards finishes a respectable but disappointing third, reminiscent of Dick Gephardt.  Richardson surprises by breaking into double digits.  (Note to all my friends backing John--if I&#039;m mistaken, I&#039;ll congratulate you tomorrow.)&lt;br /&gt;
Obama 32&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton 29&lt;br /&gt;
Edwards 24&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson 10&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitt discovers that flip-flops are bad shoes for the snow.  Even when his facts are wrong, Rev. Mike knows what he believes, and so do his true believers.  A late surge of serious Republicans delivers third place to McCain.  Wild-eyed Paulunatics carry their man to edge Fred &quot;Mr. Excitement&quot; Thompson by a nose, for what it&#039;s worth.  Fred announces his return to the regular lineup at Law &amp;amp; Order.&lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee 33&lt;br /&gt;
Romney 30&lt;br /&gt;
McCain 18&lt;br /&gt;
Paul 8&lt;br /&gt;
Thompson 8&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:40:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>danbesse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2952 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2951</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Democrats:&lt;br /&gt;
Edwards - 31%&lt;br /&gt;
Obama - 31%&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton - 25%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GOP:&lt;br /&gt;
Romney - 28%&lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee - 28%&lt;br /&gt;
McCain - 17%&lt;br /&gt;
Paul - 15%&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:36:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wayne_Goodwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2951 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2950</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dems:&lt;br /&gt;
Obama - 30&lt;br /&gt;
Edwards - 26&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton - 25&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GOP:&lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee - 28&lt;br /&gt;
Romney - 26&lt;br /&gt;
Paul - 13&lt;br /&gt;
McCain - 12&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:32:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alljames</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2950 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2946</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Democrats:&lt;br /&gt;
Obama - 31&lt;br /&gt;
Edwards - 28&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton - 26&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republicans&lt;br /&gt;
Romney - 33&lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee - 31&lt;br /&gt;
McCain - 12&lt;br /&gt;
Thompson and Paul - 10&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:30:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>natdug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2946 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Dome Office Pool: Iowa</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_dome_office_pool#comment-2944</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;DEM:&lt;br /&gt;
1) Edwards - 34&lt;br /&gt;
2) Obama - 30&lt;br /&gt;
3) Clinton - 28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;REP:&lt;br /&gt;
1) Huckabee - 33&lt;br /&gt;
2) Romney - 28&lt;br /&gt;
3) Paul - 18&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:22:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NCProsecutor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2944 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
