newsobserver.com projects - Department of Revenue - Comments

Re: Stimulus costs less

RebilVox — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:02:32 -0500

The state cannot lose something that it never had in the first place. Anticipated income from taxpayers may end up being more or less than anticipated, but to count it as a loss implies that it was somehow the property of the state from the beginning (that was then cruelly stripped away by mean old tax decreases). Subtle distinction, but one that seems to typify the current government approach to our money.

Re: Stimulus costs less

FFC1304 — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:29:52 -0500

let NC be the FIRST state to embrace the technique of the FAIRTAX.org !!!

Re: Stimulus costs less

FFC1304 — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:26:56 -0500

Why dont they do the patriotic and NOBLE thing and abolish NC state income taxes altogether? Its time for a CHANGE, remember?