<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - UNC-TV - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/unc_tv</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;UNC-TV&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards to talk about her book</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_to_talk_about_her_book#comment-26512</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And this is how UNC-TV spends their contributors money. What a waste.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:12:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kantian</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26512 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards to talk about her book</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_to_talk_about_her_book#comment-26506</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I hope Elizabeth survives cancer and her children have many good days in a normal childhood. Personally, I&#039;m very tired of the Edwards and don&#039;t see them as the nobility that apparently this paper makes them out to be. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:31:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brandermill6</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26506 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>D Congressmen on TV for Town Hall. Paul Terrell not asked.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24962</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Giggle box must not know math...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s true. I don&#039;t. I still think 18 percent is a testament to my brilliance and being a III&#039;rd just makes me three times more accomplished. I&#039;m an idiot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:57:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24962 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Five. Five Congressmen on TV.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t understand the fascination with how often our Congressmen and Congresswomen are in the state.  They are elected to represent us in Washington.  That being said, I agree with TruthSquad that Hagen made a big deal about Dole not being here, so it is hypocritical of Hagen to show such little interest in being in the state.  But, that&#039;s just a politician being a politician, right?  They could actually mean what they say and say what they mean.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:11:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ruralnc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24973 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Five. Five Congressmen on TV.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24972</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me, or has Kay Hagen been very ABSENT from the state during this recess? I have seen where all other elected officials are out and about, meeting with constituents. You would think Hagan would want to come back and let the people of North Carolina know where she stands on the issues - considering she slammed Senator Dole during the 2008 campaign for not being visible in NC.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:14:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TruthSquad</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24972 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Four D Congressmen on TV for Town Hall. R&#039;s say no way.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24946</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Giggle box must not know math but 4 R&#039;s and 4 D&#039;s have refused. So I guess the Dems are afraid too?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:21:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24946 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Five. Five Congressmen on TV.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24945</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since Price has chickened out on a Real and open to all Townhall forum, Republican Roche held one tonight in Chapell Hill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:19:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24945 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Five. Five Congressmen on TV.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24935</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;PaulTerrell, you oh-so-intelligent sage, that could be because this is for congressmen, not candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I look forward to Burr getting owned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:29:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DustinIngalls</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24935 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Five. Five Congressmen on TV.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24927</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why hasn&#039;t UNC-TV invited candidates Randall and Roche oh gigglebox? because maybe they are afraid of showing up Price and Miller?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24927 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Four D Congressmen on TV for Town Hall. R&#039;s say no way.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/four_four_congressmen_on_tv#comment-24898</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder why Republicans are so scared of the &lt;b&gt;real&lt;/b&gt; public?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ohhhhh, that whole vote thing last November. Gotcha!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:24:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24898 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Former UNC-TV exec seeks seat</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/former_unc_tv_exec_seeks_malones_seat#comment-19116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Kitchen table is saying about as original as wanting CHANGE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plus this gentleman is running against Bruce Lightner the chairman of the RWCA and the Honorable Dan Blue. I hope this doesn&#039;t hurt dan but I want him to get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:54:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19116 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Easley&#039;s table goes for $3,400</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/easleys_table_goes_for_3_400#comment-17396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It should have been burned if it was made by SLEAZELY!!!  WHAT an Ass!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:46:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17396 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Easley&#039;s table goes for $3,400</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/easleys_table_goes_for_3_400#comment-17386</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Have we formally designated a state &quot;mooch&quot; yet? (Mary Easley is unoffical and I say she deserves it)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:40:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robdarich</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17386 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Easley&#039;s table goes for $3,400</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/easleys_table_goes_for_3_400#comment-17377</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of things.  One the table was ugly--it looked like something a really uncreative child might make in 9th grade carpentry class. Two, I&#039;m sure the Easleys are happy that some doofus has given them a $3,400 tax write off. Rest assured, they&#039;ll claim the entire amount on their taxes. They&#039;ll need it to balance out the added income from Mary&#039;s exorbitant salary...Can&#039;t this guy just fade away and let the state forget him?  We have a real working governor now. You won&#039;t find Beverly Perdue in the basement hunkered down doing woodwork. She is taking care of the state&#039;s business like a governor is supposed to do..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:17:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>barbie50</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17377 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Easley&#039;s table goes for $3,400</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/easleys_table_goes_for_3_400#comment-17372</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It was wobbly. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:40:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cae1023</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17372 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
