newsobserver.com projects - journalism - Comments

Some resources via one of our bloggers

James_Protzman — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:53:10 -0400

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

scharrison — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:31:28 -0400

This sounds like a great topic for a seminar at ConvergeSouth this year. I wonder if anyone at EGHS would be interested in speaking there?

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

rossreport — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:18:30 -0400

This seems like another FOB (fear of bloggers) moment.
Please note that 'bad' lawsuits can and have come from the establishment press as well.
Of course the NCPA should offer help, advice and a web-based primer on the law here. Sooner than better would be nice.
I'm waiting for a comments suit that would mess with the ISP/Compuserve shield. That would be nuklear.

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

ryanteaguebeckwith — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:02:45 -0400

Actually, no. The purpose of the group would not be to share risk, but to give advice on avoiding it and dealing with (often empty) threats. The N.C. Press Association does not get sued when the N&O writes something, for example.

Again, I'm not saying that a group is needed. I'm just raising the question.

— RTB

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

scharrison — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:00:21 -0400

"...not everyone has the same financial and institutional backing as a daily newspaper reporter."

This may be naive, but isn't this relative? What I mean is: wouldn't increasing the status of bloggers by forming an association make them a more enticing target for civil litigation, as there would be a larger (and more lucrative) "entity" that could be found liable?

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

ryanteaguebeckwith — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:42:23 -0400

Fair enough. I would hope the First Amendment would prohibit any attempts at regulating speech like that.

— RTB

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

ThunderPig — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:39:35 -0400

Sure, I seem to remember that once upon a time, Social Security was voluntary, and promised to never rise above 1% of income either. I prefer to nip stuff like this in the bud.

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

ryanteaguebeckwith — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:06:24 -0400

Thanks for responding. I think you misread me. As with the NCPA, the only point would be to offer help to people getting sued, not to enforce any kind of so-called "standards" on bloggers.

— RTB

Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law

ThunderPig — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:50:42 -0400

No.

If newspapers would report the news, we would be little more than curiosities (I think our influence is highly over-rated). Very few people even read blogs except bloggers, but you guys try to push something like this through; EVERYONE will be reading blogs.

This is as laughable as expecting us (me especially) to follow a style book.

Re: UNC student's news story

rafeco — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:11:14 -0400

The Onion had a story on this very topic the other day.

Re: UNC student's news story

zoobatmania — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:21:26 -0400

Compared to the other impoverished areas of Chapel Hill?

Plus, go find the HUGE space they are renting that a national campaign requires in Chapel Hill.

Or, perhaps compared to the low, low prices of D.C. where Obama and Clinton are based?

This is Republican b.s. by a registered Republican "reporter" who wants her 15 minutes.

Re: UNC student's news story

greenlamp — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:16:02 -0400

plus no one really cares about your neighborhood's "villageness", that wasn't the point of the story. The point was more that Edward's preaches a doctrine of spreading the wealth yet he has his campaign headquarters in an extraordinarily affluent part of Chapel Hill.

Re: UNC student's news story

greenlamp — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:14:42 -0400

I love how you keep harping on the fact she's a registered republican as if that will automatically discredit her --

Actually babbs

zoobatmania — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:59:15 -0400

minds aren't split at all. I wonder why this registered republican didn't bother to mention the following:
1. Because of its "village"ness, most of the Edwards campaign staff live within walking or biking distance of the headquarters.
2. Because of its "affluent" villageness, most of the Edwards campaign staff can walk to lunch or to get a cup of coffee, or for dinner afterwards.
3. Because of its "too green" grass, the Edwards campaign staff can sit on that grass and watch movies and listen to music on the weekends, without driving.
4. Because of its "village" setting, the Edwards campaign staff can go out for a drink after work and WALK home instead of driving.
5. Because it is a village, complete with bookstore, grocery store, gym, dry cleaners, bank, movie theater, and many other shops, the Edwards campaign staff can take care of their daily business without hoping in their car and driving all over town.

It might be nice if the Republican interviewer had mentioned these facts, but then again we know Republicans don't believe in global warming, so the positives of a walkable neighborhood probably escaped her notice.