<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Michael Weisel - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/michael_weisel</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Michael Weisel&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some quick math on Beason&#039;s lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_quick_math_on_beasons_lobbying#comment-19118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So Beason, A democrat by the way, did not pay income taxes on the part he did not report? So why haven&#039;t he and his son been arrested? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:58:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19118 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some quick math on Beason&#039;s lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_quick_math_on_beasons_lobbying#comment-19084</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for clarifying that for me.  I was ready to sign up as a lobbyist.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:09:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19084 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some quick math on Beason&#039;s lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_quick_math_on_beasons_lobbying#comment-19083</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No, you&amp;#39;re wrong. I&amp;#39;m talking about what Beason and his clients reported to the N.C. Secretary of State as lobbying payments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He&amp;#39;d have to report all income — lobbying and consulting — to the Internal Revenue Service, and by extension, the N.C. Department of Revenue. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To be clear, I&amp;#39;m not aware of any allegations that he&amp;#39;s not paid taxes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:01:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19083 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some quick math on Beason&#039;s lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_quick_math_on_beasons_lobbying#comment-19079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan am I reading this right?  He could have possibly made a million or more but only reported $145,521, meaning he didn&#039;t have to pay the IRS, just pocketed the money?  Is that some law that those wonderful politicians came up with?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Man am I in the wrong line of work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:53:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19079 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>And Wesley Snipes paid his taxes...</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/defining_lobbying_expenses_up_to_client#comment-19078</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As Ron Binder, the former director of Greek Affairs at UNC-Chapel Hill, used to say about fraternity and sorority schemes to get around the rules concerning consumption of adult beverages:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck; it probably is a duck.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are a paid &lt;b&gt;LOBBYIST&lt;/b&gt; and perform functions related to your employment by an entity to &lt;b&gt;LOBBY&lt;/b&gt; state government; it probably is &lt;b&gt;LOBBYING&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But lawyers are famous for trying to convince us that &quot;this is not what appears to be.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Considering Weisel and Beason&#039;s close ties, Beason&#039;s former clients probably should consider hiring counsel that doesn&#039;t have a potential conflict of interest. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:49:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19078 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Sinsheimer to host Kissell event</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/sinsheimer_to_host_kissell_event#comment-10275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bless you, Mr. Sinsheimer.  Bless you. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:41:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10275 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Sinsheimer to host Kissell event</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/sinsheimer_to_host_kissell_event#comment-10258</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Raleigh is NOT in Kissell&#039;s district.  Cant believe that Sinsheimer would have Jim Hunt in his house!  Kinda makes him a big hypocrite, doesnt it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:45:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10258 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: BCP also endorses Wayne Goodwin for Insurance Commissioner</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/black_political_caucus_endorses_dellinger#comment-4621</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;After hearing remarks from the two candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for Insurance Commissioner, the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte-Mecklenburg overwhelmingly endorsed Wayne Goodwin to be North Carolina&#039;s next Insurance Commissioner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This endorsement is one of many that Goodwin has received in recent weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:02:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wayne_Goodwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4621 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Black Political Caucus endorses Dellinger</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/black_political_caucus_endorses_dellinger#comment-4595</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll post them as soon as I get them. I&amp;#39;ve heard rumors of the others, but I need to check them out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dellinger was just quick out the gate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:41:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4595 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Black Political Caucus endorses Dellinger</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/black_political_caucus_endorses_dellinger#comment-4594</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Did the caucus choose not to endorse the other candidates mentioned? Or will endorsements for other statewide offices be coming later?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:34:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4594 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fundraising numbers in treasurer&#039;s race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fundraising_numbers_in_treasurers_race#comment-3236</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d want the taxpayers to subsidize my campaign if I couldn&#039;t raise money from voters voluntarily too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And no, taxpayer subsidized elections of judges is not working. First, the state ran out of money so a special new tax was enacted to pay for it. Second, 527 committee money is still allowed that can&#039;t be rebutted if it is spent late or costs taxpayers even more if spent early. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Private donations are not bad. More money allows more information being shared with voters. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:05:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JayBlair</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3236 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fundraising numbers in treasurer&#039;s race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fundraising_numbers_in_treasurers_race#comment-3228</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Everybody is raising buckets of money these days.  I agree with Cowell&#039;s call for public financing of this office.  It&#039;s working well for the judges, and is expanding to other down-ballot offices this year.  It makes sense for the treasurer&#039;s race.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:47:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tjrutledge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3228 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fundraising numbers in treasurer&#039;s race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fundraising_numbers_in_treasurers_race#comment-3160</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What could possibly attract those kind of $$$ to David Young?  He&#039;s milktoast.  Sheesh, cant you all find somebody with some actual worthy goals???  He&#039;s more of the same BS in NC!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:36:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3160 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Ducker endorses Weisel</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/ducker_endorses_weisel#comment-2149</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is good to see that the very best nominee for the office of State Treasurer, Michael Weisel, is starting to receive the backing and media coverage he deserves!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:56:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>riverrd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2149 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Young for treasurer</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/young_for_treasurer#comment-1608</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nope, sorry...  he may be high up in the Co Commisioners realm but he is NOT very well liked in Buncombe...Please do NOT vote for him!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He&#039;s a democrackkk...We are NOT voting for anymore democrackkks as of this time.  100+ years of democrackkk domination in NC has RUINED our state!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strive to be smarter than a democrackkk...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:17:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1608 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
