<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Richard Burr - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/richard_burr</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Richard Burr&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>bah</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fetzer_elections_bode_well_for_gop#comment-27422</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:29:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27422 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Charlotte</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fetzer_elections_bode_well_for_gop#comment-27421</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The truth is, McCrory did his best to make Charlotte seem like part of another country. Pat-lite Lassiter would have been even worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:45:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27421 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fetzer: Elections bode well for GOP</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fetzer_elections_bode_well_for_gop#comment-27418</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;State GOP Chairman Tom Fetzer said Tuesday&#039;s election results are good news for Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As long as they keep pretending Charlotte is part of another country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democratic sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeep!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:43:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27418 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fetzer: Elections bode well for GOP</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fetzer_elections_bode_well_for_gop#comment-27414</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;LOL! Strange that Tom [I am not Gay] simply forgot what happen in the New York 23 rd district......I guess the Tea Baggers don&#039;t belong to the Republican party anymore.....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:25:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ConMax</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27414 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: McHenry curbs it</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/mchenry_curbs_it#comment-27389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This man is a disgrace not only to the 10th District, but to all of North Carolina. His all night party shenanigans to under age children, and questionable &#039;real estate business&#039; are more than enough of a reason for him to resign. This just cracks me up&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Montcalm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27389 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fetzer: Elections bode well for GOP</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/fetzer_elections_bode_well_for_gop#comment-27388</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Whether republicannots can perform in NC remains to be seen...they have to grow some backbone as conservatives first...its tought to overcome the most democrackkk corrupted state in the country in a year or two...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I say we OUTLAW democrackkks AND republicannots and TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY from the two EVIL forces that have stolen it!  Mandate that every candidate MUST run UNaffiliated, and cannot accept money from anyone who cannot vote for them!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:00:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27388 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Marshall and Burr are both career politicians that need to be sent home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time for new faces in the old offices.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:56:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kingixolib</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27315 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Malleus, are you kidding?  Marshall just announced that she&#039;s EXPLORING a race a few weeks ago, and she&#039;s done little but raise money and send out some blast e-mails to sign petitions and get supporter feedback on the issues.  She hasn&#039;t hardly hired any staff other than a few consultants.  That&#039;s hardly campaigning &quot;strenuously.&quot;  And the idea that she&#039;s already 10 points behind Burr, who&#039;s way under 50%, should be good news, not bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:41:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DustinIngalls</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27314 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27312</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Where is gigglebox?  I need his brilliant insight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:11:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GrayJ</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27312 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re going to malign democracy in action, at least learn to spell. And if you&#039;re going to defend Do-Nothing Burr, you might want to point something he&#039;s actually done besides obstruct what most Americans want.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a person who hates government, you sure spend an awful lot of time running for office. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:47:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27311 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Supporting anyone but Burr means one thing. That you support the filibuster proof majority in the US Senate and it&#039;s radical socialist policies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:41:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27309 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, the Democrat primary is solidly underway with the comment: &quot;Marshall may have bitten off more than she can actually chew. She should reconsider her candidacy.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think calling Marshall a high-profile member of the Council of State is stretching it.  If by high-profile you mean that she did not have to sue the state just to perform her job function, then yes.  If you mean she has any influence or has done anything in the past decade, then no.  She is a competent politician who has a donor network.  She&#039;s the best the Democrats have right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:11:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>politicalzoonc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27306 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Burr tops Marshall by 10</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_tops_marshall_by_10#comment-27303</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This poll is a bad result for Marshall who has been campaigning strenuously for months.  It is even worse than that - for Marshall has a high name recognition factor because she is a high-profile member of the Council of State, while Ken Lewis and Cal Cunningham are scarcely known at all.  Marshall may have bitten off more than she can actually chew.  She should reconsider her candidacy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:00:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MalleusMaleficarum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27303 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Campaign an uphill battle for Burr</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/campaign_and_uphill_battle_for_burr#comment-27292</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Look at what is going on with this government takeover of health care. That alone should make everyone want to keep the Democrats from keeping or getting a bigger stake in eth US Senate. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:40:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27292 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Art Pope says Burr popular!</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/campaign_and_uphill_battle_for_burr#comment-27287</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No thank you Genius for bumping this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re: &lt;b&gt;Campaign an uphill battle for Burr&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Submitted by ruralnc on October 30, 2009 - 4:57pm.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hate to bring you all the bad news but it seems Burr isn’t as unpopular as you think. A new &lt;B&gt;Civitas poll&lt;/b&gt; released today shows Burr with and 10 point lead over Marshall. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Art Pope. Civitas. HA! Go send out more BCBS mailers praising Dick already.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:50:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27287 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
