<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Richard Stevens - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/richard_stevens</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Richard Stevens&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dome Memo: On the hot seat</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dome_memo_on_the_hot_seat#comment-17986</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gosh, you are enjoying the 2009 elections way to much. Do you really think that the democrat will always win forever because of bush. Keep dreaming, because as sure as the democrats kicked it in 09, they will get put back in their box in a later election. People are already sick of obama,democrat congress and senate. As for cooper I think he is good man, but if runs in 2010, it will not be his year.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:28:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17986 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dome Memo: On the hot seat</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dome_memo_on_the_hot_seat#comment-17590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Gosh by Gosh what are you talking about.  Senator Burr has not abandoned constituent services to run for 2010.  He is continuing to do his job and is working hard at it.  The only ones running a campaign right now is the Democrats who never did end the campaign.  I would predict that by the time he does begin to campaign Bush will look much better than the current president does.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:30:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lpetrou</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17590 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dome Memo: On the hot seat</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dome_memo_on_the_hot_seat#comment-17585</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like Burr&#039;s the one on the hot seat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cooper_41_burr_38&quot;&gt;losing to an unannounced yellow dog&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/burr_game_on&quot;&gt;abandoning constituent services 20 months out to run for 2010&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why should Cooper do anything but watch the implosion with the rest of us?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incumbents that deserve re-election don&#039;t run for it, they do their job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe he hired Dole and McCrory stragglers and wants to bring in Bush for a fundraiser and run a Godless ad before the rush. HA!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:56:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17585 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill calls for &#039;he or she&#039; in laws</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_calls_for_he_or_she_in_laws#comment-17470</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Make a mountain out of a mole hill will ya! Bunch of pansy wasted Politicians.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:43:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vickiej40</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17470 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill calls for &#039;he or she&#039; in laws</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_calls_for_he_or_she_in_laws#comment-17459</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever happened to common sense?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:13:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17459 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill calls for &#039;he or she&#039; in laws</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_calls_for_he_or_she_in_laws#comment-17451</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good lord.  I think there are a little more pressing issues out there than worrying about offending left handed seagulls.   You were elected to do a job.  Do it.  Don&#039;t waste time with petty crap like this.  So no vote for Laura Wiley.  SHE doesn&#039;t know what SHE (or should I say it) is doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:03:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>almon007</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17451 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill calls for &#039;he or she&#039; in laws</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_calls_for_he_or_she_in_laws#comment-17452</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;All in favor of using &quot;they&quot; or &quot;them&quot; as singular pronouns where the gender is unclear, say &quot;Aye.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AYE!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:02:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FurbishLousewart</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17452 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill calls for &#039;he or she&#039; in laws</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_calls_for_he_or_she_in_laws#comment-17450</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Would our politicians care to waste anymore of their time arguing and reforming semantics?  God forbid anything productive gets done.   The fact that idiots like this run our country scares the hell out of me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:00:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>L3G10N</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17450 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Rule review</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senate_files_first_bill#comment-15254</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I read your last sentence in a different context than you intended.  Was funny to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:50:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15254 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Rule review</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senate_files_first_bill#comment-15253</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of those times when you don&#039;t know whether to laugh or cry.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It took me a while to believe there was actually a conflict about letting people practice falconry on Sundays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s my understanding that some groups don&#039;t want falconry allowed on Sundays because it&#039;s a slippery slope to allowing hunting on Sundays.  Somehow the idea of birds &quot;hunting&quot; on a Sunday is a danger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone, please tell me I&#039;m wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I stand amazed in the presence of...lunacy!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(And, yes, sing that last sentence to the tune).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:46:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cornbread</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15253 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Rule review</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senate_files_first_bill#comment-15250</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;cornbread I am still shaking my head over your last sentence.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:38:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15250 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rule review</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senate_files_first_bill#comment-15247</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Boseman&#039;s bill might be an attempt to force negotiations during the Rule Review process on this item.  She did the same thing with stormwater rules last year (filing a bill regarding rule changes that forced both sides to sit down and talk to each other).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t the &quot;hunting on Sundays&quot; rule change issue more to do with falconry and crossbows and less about gunfire?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surely birds can be allowed to hunt on Sundays without endangering the citizenry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:22:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cornbread</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15247 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Senate files first bill</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senate_files_first_bill#comment-15244</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry hunters but we do not need hunting on Sundays.  That is the only day that people can get out and walk in the woods if they want to without fear of getting shot.  Even their own property can be dangerous during hunting season.  And yes I love deer meat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:07:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15244 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Federal money won&#039;t plug leaky bucket</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/federal_money_wont_plug_leaky_bucket#comment-15077</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There wouldn&#039;t be a &quot;leaky bucket&quot; if state budget writers had acted responsibly during the last expansion. Now is the time to knuckle down, deal with the shortfall, and lay down &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnlocke.org/spotlights/20090107215.html&quot;&gt;responsible budgeting principles&lt;/a&gt; to allow the government to weather the next one. It&#039;s time to break the spend-and-tax cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:24:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonoflocke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15077 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Odometer tax to offset dropping per gallon tax revenues...</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/panel_reccommends_odometer_tax#comment-14012</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Per my colleague, Mark Johnson: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part of the tax, 17.5 cents, is a flat per-gallon rate. An additional 12.35 cents rises or falls with the wholesale price of gas, adjusted every six months. Gas has now fallen below the price at which the adjustable portion of the tax was frozen two years ago, so the cap is irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:06:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14012 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
