<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Charles Schumer - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/charles_schumer</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Charles Schumer&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Schumer&#039;s take</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/quotes/schumers_take#comment-8643</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So does this endorsement mean that Kay is for abolishing our rights to own semi-automatic handguns and rifles? For Schumer does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:53:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8643 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Schumer: Hagan&#039;s on fire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/schumer_hagans_on_fire#comment-8626</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you follow Alec Baldwins comments then you have seriously delusional issues...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How can democrackkks embrace a man who called his 12 year old daughter a PIG?  But you gotta love Kim Bassinger for putting that out to the media!&lt;br /&gt;
LOLOLOL....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:29:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8626 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Schumer: Hagan&#039;s on fire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/schumer_hagans_on_fire#comment-8617</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have had enough years of incompetent lying Republican mediocrity at the National level, in which the GOP, to paraphrase Alec Baldwin, has its lips firmly affixed to the derriere of the Christian right.  This form of Republicanism is strong in this state - the latest example being Republican support for bullying and killing of gay kids or even just kids who are taunted as gay, whether they really are or not.  Let&#039;s dispense with any notion that this has to do with morality, which the Republicans claim is the sole property of their sanctimonious yet hypocritical and vacuous party.  So, what difference does it make to say a state is &quot;solidly&quot; Republican or just &quot;likely&quot; to be Republican.  Neither is a compliment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:20:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Real_Americans_Think</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8617 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Schumer: Hagan&#039;s on fire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/schumer_hagans_on_fire#comment-8613</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Disavow his comments, Kaye...Schumer is the SURE kiss of death for a worthy candidate!  He ruins careers...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:03:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8613 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Schumer&#039;s take</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/quotes/schumers_take#comment-8611</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Schumer&#039;s endorsement is the SURE kiss of death!  Deny his comments, Kaye!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:56:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8611 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Please watch your reporting</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/schumer_hagans_on_fire#comment-8610</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Were these &quot;clarfications&quot; the necessary result of careless report on your behalf or where they the result of biased reporting attempting to put the N&amp;amp;O&#039;s Democrat spin on things?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You really should be more careful, people could think you were as biased as the editorial page if too many more clarifications like these were needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:52:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Senate</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8610 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Miller mulls</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/miller_mulls#comment-670</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Brad&#039;s office needs to do a better job responding to constiuent concerns about the impending war on Iran.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:58:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>RaleighRendezvous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 670 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
