
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - RGA uses old methodology on taxes - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/rga_uses_old_methodology_on_taxes</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;RGA uses old methodology on taxes&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: RGA uses old methodology on taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/rga_uses_old_methodology_on_taxes#comment-10174</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why should they change their ad when Beverly plays games with the numbers in her attack ad on McCrory on vouchers?  Maybe, she is struggling with numbers because she took math classes in our public schools!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:17:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>razor0397</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10174 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RGA uses old methodology on taxes</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/rga_uses_old_methodology_on_taxes</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- Begin check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- End check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- Begin check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/rgas_status_quo_ad&quot;&gt;Two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/rgas_second_status_quo_ad&quot;&gt;ads&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rga.org/&quot;&gt;Republican Governors Association&lt;/a&gt; rely in part on outmoded information from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxfoundation.org/&quot;&gt;The Tax Foundation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ads, which target Democrat &lt;a href=&quot;/dome/profiles/beverly_perdue&quot;&gt;Beverly Perdue&lt;/a&gt;, say that North Carolina has &amp;quot;the largest-growing tax burden in the country.&amp;quot; The RGA told Dome that it based the claim on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/printer/22332.html&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; April 12, 2007 article from The Tax Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to the article, North Carolina&amp;#39;s state-local tax burden jumped from 36th highest in 2000 to 19th highest in 2007 &lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: &#039;Times New Roman&#039;&quot;&gt;– &lt;/span&gt;&amp;quot;the largest increase of any state.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/sl_burden_northcarolina-20080807.pdf&quot;&gt;this chart&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) from The Tax Foundation says that since 2000 North Carolina&amp;#39;s rank has fluctuated between 17th and 22nd. In 2008, it is 20th.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What gives?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Tax Foundation told Dome Tuesday that it has changed its methodology since the 2007 article. The article used the old methodology, which the foundation considers less accurate than its new methodology, said Gerald Prante, an economist with the foundation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prante said the new methodology does a better job accounting for out-of-state taxpayers, among other things. &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s changed, just searching for what the truth is, trying to get the best estimate possible,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Foundation spokesman Matt Moon apologized for the confusion. &amp;quot;That&amp;#39;s very much our bad,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The new methodology has been the subject of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbpp.org/8-8-08sfp.htm&quot;&gt;some criticism&lt;/a&gt; from another tax policy group that is more liberal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The RGA has not said whether it will now change the ad.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-footer&quot;&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-comments&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/rga_uses_old_methodology_on_taxes#comment&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/images/front_new/icon_discussion.gif&quot; width=&quot;11&quot; height=&quot;7&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt; Comments (1)&lt;/a&gt;
	
	&lt;!-- If permissions, display edit link at end of teaser --&gt;
	
		
	&lt;!-- End edit link code --&gt;
	
	&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;!-- End check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;

&lt;!-- BEGIN AUDIO ATTACHMENT CODE --&gt;

	
    
</description>
 <comments>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/rga_uses_old_methodology_on_taxes#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/beverly_perdue">Beverly Perdue</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/governor_08">Governor &amp;#039;08</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/republican_governors_association">Republican Governors Association</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/tax_foundation">Tax Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/taxes">taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/project/under_the_dome">Under the Dome</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:49:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DavidIngram</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9258 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
