newsobserver.com projects - Ethics suit could cost $40,000 - Comments

Re: Ethics suit could cost $40,000

bkrueger — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:33:39 -0400

It's actually in the second paragraph, but it's there to identify the reporter who wrote the item.

We have a lot of reporters who contribute to this blog (see the list in the right-hand column), but sometimes someone else does the actual posting.

Re: Ethics suit could cost $40,000

Cottonelle — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:39:19 -0400

Why is "reports Dan Kane" in the first paragraph?

It's a crooked Auditor that is causing this spending.

zoobatmania — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:14:15 -0400

There is no story here, he's just trying to save his job.

Re: Ethics suit could cost $40,000

ebetz — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:31:14 -0400

Demorats in Action!!! Why are we spending any State money at all on these Lawyers. The Demorat party committed these "sins" during an election campaign and the money for legal actions resulting should come from their campaign funds!!! Why are tax $ involved? Because Demorats priorities on spending money is Tax dollars first, get some donor to front the money second, campaign funds third and finaly personal dollars but on if it means not having to go to jail!!

Ethics suit could cost $40,000

bkrueger — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:02:27 -0400

A legal battle involving the State Ethics Commission and the Office of State Auditor could end up costing taxpayers $40,000.

The N.C. Attorney General's Office has determined that it has a conflict in representing either party in a lawsuit the commission filed earlier this month, reports Dan Kane.

So both sides are hiring private lawyers to handle the matter. Gov. Mike Easley authorized an initial cap of $20,000 for each party.

Noelle Talley, a spokeswoman for the attorney general, said chief deputy Grayson Kelley had unsuccessfully sought to mediate the dispute.

The battle is over whether the commission has to comply with the auditor's investigation into an allegation of preferential treatment for Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, the Democratic nominee for governor. A Perdue aide visited the commission's office to review Perdue's financial disclosure statements and was allowed to look at them alone in a vacant office.

Since then, a log noting the arrangement was altered and the employee who made the notation has been fired. Ethics commission officials say nothing was improper in the visit and the employee was not fired as a result of the notation.