
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Moore on amendments - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/moore_on_amendments</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Moore on amendments&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Moore on amendments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/moore_on_amendments</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- Begin check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- End check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- Begin check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Treasurer &lt;a href=&quot;/dome/profiles/richard_moore&quot;&gt;Richard Moore&lt;/a&gt; supports a constitutional amendment on eminent domain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor, he wrote Dome that the state constitution must protect private property rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I support amending the Constitution to restrict eminent domain to clear public uses and ban its use when it would primarily benefit private interests,&amp;quot; he wrote. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But he said that a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage would be &amp;quot;redundant.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Current state law clearly defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.  I see no reason why the state Supreme Court would interpret it in any other way,&amp;quot; he wrote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2007&amp;amp;BillID=h878&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; putting the &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/eminent_amendment_imminent&quot;&gt;eminent domain&lt;/a&gt; amendment on the ballot is in the Senate. Last month, House Speaker &lt;a href=&quot;/dome/profiles/joe_hackney&quot;&gt;Joe Hackney&lt;/a&gt; killed a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2007&amp;amp;BillID=H493&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that would have put a &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/marriage_vow&quot;&gt;gay marriage ban&lt;/a&gt; before voters. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-footer&quot;&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-comments&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/moore_on_amendments#comment&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/images/front_new/icon_discussion.gif&quot; width=&quot;11&quot; height=&quot;7&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt; Comments (0)&lt;/a&gt;
	
	&lt;!-- If permissions, display edit link at end of teaser --&gt;
	
		
	&lt;!-- End edit link code --&gt;
	
	&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;!-- End check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;

&lt;!-- BEGIN AUDIO ATTACHMENT CODE --&gt;

	
    
</description>
 <comments>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/moore_on_amendments#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/eminent_domain">eminent domain</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/gay_marriage">gay marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/governor_08">Governor &amp;#039;08</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/joe_hackney">Joe Hackney</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/richard_moore">Richard Moore</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/project/under_the_dome">Under the Dome</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:06:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">879 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
