newsobserver.com projects - Drought bill moves ahead - Comments

Re: Drought bill moves ahead

scharrison — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:53:17 -0400

The problem with drought plans is easily reflected in the comment below. People will only conserve when they see themselves in a crisis, and a little bit of rainfall is enough to make them think everything's fine. Well, it's not fine, and it hasn't been for some time now.

We need to change the way we handle water, which means we need to change the design of our homes and buildings. Reusing grey water for toilets and irrigation saves an incredible amount of potable water, even when people aren't trying to conserve.

Re: Drought bill moves ahead

MeckDeck — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:25:47 -0400

Meanwhile, Wadesboro got like 4 inches of rain yesterday. The bill is already working.

JAT

Re: Drought bill moves ahead

FFC1304 — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:18:51 -0400

Pryor Gibson likes as much citizen oppression thru laws as possible. Im sure he DOES want to ADD MORE THINGS!!! Never met a democrackkk who didnt want to add more restrictions...strive to be smarter than a NC democrackkk!

Now where is it that Gibson's children attend school? In Rawleigh you say?
But we thought he lived in Wadesboro? His wife works in Rawleigh too? huh.

Drought bill moves ahead

bniolet — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:46:09 -0400

A drought bill cleared a legislative committee Tuesday, offering a chance that the legislature will pass a drought law this session.

Environmental groups, municipalities, industry types, the legislature and the governor's office have struggled to reach agreement on exactly how the state should respond to a drought. Lawmakers, representatives of the governor and others were up until 3 a.m. this morning trying to hammer out a compromise, officials said.

The version of the bill that got a favorable report from the House Environment and Natural Resources on Tuesday requires water systems to file drought plans with the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

The department could reject inadequate plans. In cases of severe, extreme or exceptional drought, the department could force a water system to implement it's plan, and if the plan falls short of conservation goals, state officials could force a water system to implement harsher restrictions.

A previous version of the bill gave the state's chief environment official the power to impose water restrictions.

Some lawmakers complained Tuesday that the bill doesn't do enough to support conservation efforts through education.

Rep. Pryor Gibson, a Wadesboro Democrat and one of bill's primary sponsors, said that he supports doing more, but that just hammering out the current version was a struggle.

"Should we add more things it it? Absolutely. Can we get the votes for it on this complex bill? I don't know," Gibson said.

The governor's office and the League of Municipalities support the current bill, which is H 2499.