
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Barr was a spoiler after all - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Barr was a spoiler after all&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13771</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The facts, while interesting....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:11:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13771 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13731</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the thoughtful comment, but I&amp;#39;m sticking with my definition of a spoiler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:34:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13731 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;RTB, you should change the post.  &quot;Barr was possibly a spoiler&quot; or &quot;If you make some unrealistic assumptions on the behavior of Barr voters, then Barr was maybe a spoiler&quot;.  Either are better than the declarative statement &quot;Barr was a spoiler after all.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:32:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13729 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13721</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;True. It&amp;#39;s impossible to know how people would have voted, but it&amp;#39;s worth pointing out when the third-party candidate gets more votes than the margin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:10:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13721 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13719</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s just math.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:08:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dwcatty</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13719 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13717</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The only way that Barr was the deciding factor would be if (1) all Barr voters cast a vote for president, and (2) those Barr voters favored McCain by at least 19,957 (78%) to 5,765 (22%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those are two big &quot;if&#039;s&quot;.  Particularly, there&#039;s no reason to think Barr voters would favor McCain by such a large margin.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:04:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13717 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Barr didn&#039;t spoil anything except the Libertarian Party</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment-13715</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;That puts Barr into elite company in North Carolina.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It sure did! It proves that Barr is no voter getter period! My dog would have got 25 thousand votes by simply having his bone on the ballot! Where did you political training at? The Ed Cone reverse school of new age establishment math!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:00:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ConMax</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13715 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Barr was a spoiler after all</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- Begin check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- End check for Blog Icon --&gt;
&lt;!-- Begin check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bob Barr was a spoiler in North Carolina after all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Though the Libertarian presidential candidate made only &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/barr_coming_to_n_c_next_tuesday&quot;&gt;token appearances&lt;/a&gt; in the state and received a miniscule number of votes in November, he still got more votes than the margin of difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barr&amp;#39;s 25,722 votes were more than one and a half times the &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/obamas_final_margin_14_912_votes&quot;&gt;14,192 margin&lt;/a&gt; that made &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/profiles/barack_obama&quot;&gt;Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; winner of the state over &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/profiles/john_mccain&quot;&gt;John McCain&lt;/a&gt;. Put another way, Barr had about 0.6 percent of the vote, while the margin was about 0.3 percent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That puts Barr into elite company in North Carolina.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As previously &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/presidential_spoilers_in_n_c_history#comment&quot;&gt;noted&lt;/a&gt;, there have been five third-party candidates who earned enough votes to affect the race between the Republican and Democrat in North Carolina since 1908.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace&quot;&gt;George Wallace&lt;/a&gt; in 1968, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt&quot;&gt;Teddy Roosevelt&lt;/a&gt; in 1912, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Perot&quot;&gt;Ross Perot&lt;/a&gt; in 1992 and in 1996 and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anderson&quot;&gt;John Anderson&lt;/a&gt; in 1980. (Technically, Roosevelt did not earn more than the margin of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anderson&quot;&gt;Woodrow Wilson&amp;#39;s&lt;/a&gt; win, but he came in second so we count him.) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, Barr earned the smallest percentage of any of the other spoilers, and the number of write-in votes was close enough to the margin this year to almost qualify on its own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://edcone.typepad.com/wordup/2008/05/barrs-impact-in.html&quot;&gt;Update: &lt;/a&gt;Greensboro blogger Ed Cone &lt;a href=&quot;/under_the_dome/will_libertarian_party_swing_n_c&quot;&gt;called it&lt;/a&gt; in mid-May.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-footer&quot;&gt;
	&lt;div class=&quot;node-blog-teaser-comments&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/images/front_new/icon_discussion.gif&quot; width=&quot;11&quot; height=&quot;7&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt; Comments (7)&lt;/a&gt;
	
	&lt;!-- If permissions, display edit link at end of teaser --&gt;
	
		
	&lt;!-- End edit link code --&gt;
	
	&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;!-- End check for Teaser Toggle --&gt;

&lt;!-- BEGIN AUDIO ATTACHMENT CODE --&gt;

	
    
</description>
 <comments>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/barr_was_a_spoiler_after_all#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/barack_obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/bob_barr">Bob Barr</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/ed_cone">Ed Cone</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/george_wallace">George Wallace</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/john_anderson">John Anderson</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/john_mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/libertarian_party">Libertarian Party</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/president_08">President &amp;#039;08</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/ross_perot">Ross Perot</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/spoilers">spoilers</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/teddy_roosevelt">Teddy Roosevelt</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/project/under_the_dome">Under the Dome</category>
 <category domain="http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/woodrow_wilson">Woodrow Wilson</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:38:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">10765 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
