Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs

Babb: Shocked by phone call

Carla Babb said she was "shocked" when John Edwards' campaign called her and asked her to take a news story off the Internet.

The UNC-Chapel Hill graduate student said her professor had approved the script for a news segment on Edwards' headquarters, and she thought it was balanced when she posted it on YouTube Tuesday night.

But the next morning, Edwards' campaign spokeswoman Colleen Murray called her cell phone.

"She said this sounds like it came straight from the Republican Party," Babb said. "She was like, 'This has to come down.'"

Babb was surprised to hear that online commenters — like this one — had attacked her for being a registered Republican. She pointed out that she interned as an undergraduate student for U.S. Rep. Bob Etheridge, a Democrat.

"My political affiliation isn't in any of my stories," she said.


Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Babb: Shocked by phone call

Thank God there's a student at Chapel Hill smart enough NOT to be a stinking registered democrackkk! Who KNEW?

Re: Babb: changing the "slant" of a story...

That's an interesting point. As one who has been on the "subject" end of a number of news and feature interviews about music and politics by campus newspapers and others, I have often been caught off-guard about the changing of what what initially indicated would be the focus of the story. And there were times when I made the case that the writer was omitting the central position of the subject of the interview on the primary issues of concern. But I never would have considered trying to halt in advance or after the fact--in the case of an online report--or in advance in the case of a print report the actual internal production of the news or feature interview by the press organization involved.

Then the New York Times report of Saturday clarified the question of where the original complaint about the story in The Daily Tar Heel originated from--it was the national headquarters of the Edwards camppaign, not the North Carolina office, which however did the followup. So we get back to what this writer has questioned about the guidance of the Edwards campaign for many months: is it a Michigan-directed campaign under former Congressman David Bonior of that state or is there truly a North Carolina base for this campaign?

The News & Observer should give Hodding Carter at UNC a holler about this unusual press-politics controversy to see what the former Southern newspaperman and presidential press spokesman might have to say about such situations in general.

David McKnight

Re: Babb: Shocked by phone call

Then you have that fine representation of the Edwards campaign's basic outlook and philosophy by the UNC student working on the staff, but this exemplary effort in campaign involvement by the Carolina student is practically entirely undone by the surprising and inappropriate attempted intervention in campus press operations by the Edwards campaign staff.

Ever since Watergate, the press has sometimes failed to distinguish between difficulties committed at mid-staff levels in campaigns or governmental offices and actions reflecting a lack of judgment by those at the top, including candidates and public officials themselves. Too often the press will take a pass on mid-level staff or departmental shenanigans or other difficulties, waiting instead for some connection, plausible or dubious, to be made between the working staff level and the person actually having ultimate responsibility for the whole operation.

Admirers of the phenomenal talents, achievements and dedicated hard work on the campaign trail by John and Elizabeth Edwards can only hope that this episode was strictly a local staff-level production!

What is needed is a statement from the candidate to the effect that while he appreciates the enthusiasm with which some on his staff may wish to defend his political interests and philosophical vantage points, John Edwards does not endorse this sort of meddling in the work of the press, whether within campus press organization staffs, or in the offices of professional news media operations. And this better be soon too because a story like this could draw caution flags in campaign camps from Iowa to New Hampshire.

And all this over an interesting and appealing business and residential location linking Chatham County with Chapel Hill. They even have Chapel Hill-Carrboro public bus transporation routes connecting Southern Village with Chapel Hill and UNC, so this area is not without its own "public access."

All in all, one of the more curious staff episodes in the presidential campaigns of candidates of both parties thus far in the state of North Carolina, which is another reason we need more reporting and news and editorial analysis by The News & Observer on the basic operations modes and political attitudes of all presidential campaign organizing efforts, Democratic and Republican, in the Triangle region and across North Carolina.

During the course of this campaign, many individuals and groups have been subjected to various inappropriate and unjustiable pressures from political operatives, so the people naturally would like to have more information on just where these unpleasantries are emanating from. In short, we need to know what the people working in all the presidential campaigns with a presence in North Carolina really believe about the perspectives of the public, the press and voter issue groups here in the Old North State.

David P. McKnight

Re: Babb: changing the "slant" of a story...

after gaining "access" for another reason is a mark of an inexperienced journalist when viewed in the kindest terms.

If her own ethical compass had been truly developed completely, the least she would have done was call the campaign to get their response to putting the HQ location where it was - that's called fair and balanced, and while not required by any journalist, is just a good and solidly ethical decision.

It doesn't take a genius to come up with the script for that: "I wanted to let you know that my story has changed and this is what is now the basis. I was wondering if you had any comment?" She doesn't have to let them see the story, or tell them everything that's in it, and she would've come out smelling like a rose.

Alas, too many journalism students today are being taught the slash-and-burn hit-style journalism, a la Murdoch-outlet style. I'm sure Miss Babb will find a job with the New York Post, Fox News, or FEMA in the future.

As my media ethics professor (a working journalist) liked to put it - you need a license for practicing law and medicine, but not journalism. The gist of his sentiment is at least there is some professional standard quality control. Unfortunately, anyone can practice journalism under any standard, as Miss Babb's story illustrates.

"She was like, 'This has to come down.'"

Gotta, like, love the New J-School. Heh.

PS Thanks for getting closer to the bottom of this. Sounds like her "professor" has had more than a little involvement in the mess. (Someone should tell the student that interning with Etheridge barely qualifies as working for a Democrat.)

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go
Advertisements